康宝莱萨曼莎运动视频:我们为什么如此焦虑

2011年12月23日 08:47:57
来源： 中国青年报
新华微博

【字号：大中小】【打印】
2011年，雾霾天气击中民众的“污染焦虑”；食品行业的新国标制定引发“食品安全焦虑”；“郭美美”事件和“河南宋基会”事件引发“公益焦虑”；“限堵令”与“出行难”带来“拥堵焦虑”……这些纠结与争议背后，是一种典型的社会心态：“公共焦虑”。（《中国青年报》12月22日）
“公共焦虑”并没有出现在2011年的年度热词和年度汉字里，但其中无论哪一个字词，其实都渗透着民众深深的焦虑，“公共焦虑”已成为2011年中国社会繁复图景的浓浓底色。那么，我们到底为何如此焦虑？
一者，现实生活中确实可能存在公众情绪相互感染、相互激发的情况，经由互联网的强大动员，一旦发生一起公共事件，则整个社会的关注立刻聚集起来，蔚成声势。正因为网络的高度互动，媒体的强力介入，才使得以往处于蛰伏状态的“公共焦虑”发散开来，并成为政府和社会共同关注的焦点。而公众相互之间的情绪传递，使得一些价值迅速凸显、一些意见迅速传播，当然，与之相关的社会共识也在一点点逐渐形成。
再者，“公共焦虑”如此深广、频繁，也折射出时下公共决策的某些迟滞、含混和霸蛮。大凡能进入“公共焦虑”视野的，往往都是事关公共利益的话题、事件。社会公众对此表现出一点关心，希望多一些参与，甚至期待有自己的一份表达，这些都在情理之中。这样的参与关乎个人利益、内心安宁，更体现了现代社会最为稀缺也最该珍视的公民精神。负责主持这些公共事务的政府、社会组织等，理应以包容、宽容、开放的心态直面公众，持平行事，而不是习惯于权力宣示、封闭运行、暗箱操作等。
以PM2.5监测为例，公众明明已体验和感受到空气污浊，可一些城市的管理者还在那里大唱高调，甚至说什么“雾天不等于污染天”、“现在与以前比有进步”，这样的回应效果可想而知。日前，国家环保部环境监测司副司长朱建平接受采访时披露：“个别地方一些主政者，不是把精力放在改善环境质量上，而是放在改善环境数据上。”（《京华时报》12月22日）官员一旦热衷于改善“数据”而非“质量”，民意又如何不焦虑？
还是2010年，一个“被”字风行一时，进入2011年，在各方力量推动下，特别是中央提出了社会管理创新的新思路之后，民意“被代表”的情形正在改观，公权力也开始习惯了被质询乃至主动开放。公共决策的核心正在于公共参与，而其生命力、公信力，也来自最广泛的公共参与。而开放一旦起步，民意肯定会要求更大的开放。政府不断释放善意，民众的“公共焦虑”才一点点消解。
眼下，国家环保部公布PM2.5监测发布时间表，称明年直辖市和省会城市都要开展PM2.5和臭氧监测，这正是政府对于民意焦虑的积极回应。
可见，政府包括一些社会组织，都应找到行为的边界，而公众的利益诉求，也在这样的边界中逐渐清晰。正如有专家所指出的，在公共事务领域，政府部门应将信息发布模式从自上而下的“决定-宣布”模式，转化为多渠道、多层次的“反馈-协商”模式。如此，方才有可能真正化解“公共焦虑”。
要之，不是我们总喜欢焦虑，也不是我们总喜欢传递焦虑，而是政府在公共决策的过程中应积极回应民众的公共焦虑。唯有如此，公民离幸福才可能更近一点。
Why do we so worried
On December 23, 2011 08:47:57
Source:China youth daily
Xinhua micro bo

The text:biginsmall】 【print】
In 2011, the fog weather hit the haze people "pollution anxiety";Food industry's new national standard for a "food safety anxiety";"GuoMeiMei" events and "henan SongJi will" incident a "public anxiety";"Limit blocking to make" and "travel difficult to" bring "the congestion anxiety".............These entanglements and dispute behind, is a typical kind of social mentality: "public anxiety".(the China youth daily December 22)
"Public anxiety" and did not appear in the 2011 annual hot words and annual Chinese characters, but one of them no matter what words, actually was imbued with people deep anxiety, "public anxiety" has become 2011 Chinese society heavy and complicated picture of thick impression.So, what are we why so worried?
Darling, real life really possible infection, the public mood each other mutual stimulate, via the Internet mobilization of strong, once in place together public events, the entire social attention immediately gathered together, and WeiCheng momentum.Because of the highly interactive network, the media's strong interference, just make dormant in the state of the past "public anxiety" divergent spreads, and become the government and society to focus.And the public mood transfer between each other, make a few highlights, some opinions value quickly spread rapidly, of course, with other social consensus also gradually formed in a little bit.
Moreover, "public anxiety" so deep, frequent, also reflects some of the hysteresis current public decision-making, ambiguity and the pretty.A can into the "public anxiety" field of vision, often are all issues public interest issues, events.The social public to show a little concerned about, hope more participation, even looking forward to have an own expression, these are sensible.Such participation for personal interests, inner peace, but also the modern society the most the most scarce also cherished civil spirit.In charge of the affairs of the government, the social organization and so on, should be forgiving, tolerance, an open mind face to face with the public, in flat, not used to power declare, closed operation, earmarking, etc.
To PM2.5 monitoring as an example, the public clearly has experience and feel dirty air, but some of the city's manager was still there big make impractical saying, even said that what "foggy weather is not equal to pollution day", "now than before and there is progress", a response to effect it can be imagined.Recently, the state department chief of the environmental monitoring she dr.zhu interviews disclosure: "the individual who wants to place some, not to focus on improving environmental quality, but in improving the environment data."(by the Beijing times December 22) officials once keen to improve "data" and the "quality", public opinion and how to don't worried?
Or in 2010, a "is" the word is a fad, in 2011, to promote the parties in power, especially the central puts forward the new idea of social management innovation after, public opinion "is representative" case are improving, public power also started the habit is examined and active open.The core of the public decision is in public participation in, and their vitality, credibility, and also comes from the most extensive public participation.And open once started, public opinion will demand more open.Government to release the good will, of the people "public anxiety" just a little bit of digestion.
For now, countries announced she PM2.5 monitoring release schedule, said provincial capital cities next year municipalities directly under the central government and to develop PM2.5 and ozone monitoring, this is what the government for public opinion of the anxiety of positive response.
Visible, government, including some social organization, should find the boundary of the behavior, and the benefit of the public appeal, also in this boundary gradually clear.As with expert points out, in the field of public affairs, government departments shall information release from top-down model "decision-announced" mode, into multi-channel, multi-level "feedback-consultation" mode.So, just be fully resolve "public anxiety".
To, not we always like anxiety, also is not we always like transfer anxiety, but the government in public decision-making process should be actively respond to people's public anxiety.But it is the only way to happiness may be more from citizens closer.